Valdis, That's the way!!!! The government must have a kind of protocol to allow OS to be released. I believe that Windows will no longer exist after that. LOL.
2010/1/25 <[email protected]> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:03:03 -0200, Rafael Moraes said: > > This is a subject that need to be discussed very carefully. I agree, It > > should be "controlled", but, how far? > > In particular, one must be *very* careful to not create unintended > consequences. For instance, in general the more regulated an industry is, > the > more risk-adverse the companies get - both because regulation implies > "don't > rock the boat" and the second-order effects of compliance paperwork and > similar > issues. Look at the mountains of paperwork needed to get the FAA to > type-certify a new airplane as airworthy - what if Microsoft had to do that > level of detail for Windows 8, the next release of Exchange, and the next > release of Office? > > How do you make Microsoft "regulated" in any meaningful sense, and still > allow > them the ability to ship an out-of-cycle patch? > > -- Att, Rafael Moraes Linux Professional Institute Certified - Level 1 ITIL Foundations Certified
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
