Not even Linux or OSX for the matter....
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Rafael Moraes <[email protected]> wrote: > Valdis, > > That's the way!!!! The government must have a kind of protocol to allow OS > to be released. > I believe that Windows will no longer exist after that. LOL. > > 2010/1/25 <[email protected]> > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:03:03 -0200, Rafael Moraes said: >> > This is a subject that need to be discussed very carefully. I agree, It >> > should be "controlled", but, how far? >> >> In particular, one must be *very* careful to not create unintended >> consequences. For instance, in general the more regulated an industry is, >> the >> more risk-adverse the companies get - both because regulation implies >> "don't >> rock the boat" and the second-order effects of compliance paperwork and >> similar >> issues. Look at the mountains of paperwork needed to get the FAA to >> type-certify a new airplane as airworthy - what if Microsoft had to do >> that >> level of detail for Windows 8, the next release of Exchange, and the next >> release of Office? >> >> How do you make Microsoft "regulated" in any meaningful sense, and still >> allow >> them the ability to ship an out-of-cycle patch? >> >> > > > -- > Att, > Rafael Moraes > Linux Professional Institute Certified - Level 1 > ITIL Foundations Certified > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
