Their conclusions are based, IMO, on a flawed methodology. With some conservative assumptions, the paper indicates that companies actually spend 50% of their budget protecting secrets versus 20% on complying with external regulations.
I wrote up a more thorough response which I'll post in a few days when I've proof-read it some more. On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Christopher Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > The paper concludes that companies are underinvesting in--or improperly > prioritizing--the protection of their secrets. Nowhere does it state that > the money spent on compliance is money wasted. > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Mike Hale <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I find the findings completely flawed. Am I missing something? > > -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
