On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Christian Sciberras <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes. Once again: get your homework done! >> >>> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/DLL/dynamicdllloading.aspx >> >> That's a double DYNAMIC there! > > Did you even bother to read the article? The very first paragraph > states the difference between the two. > > Oh, and for the records, you can't statically link to dll files. At > least, not in the way you're imagining. > Static linking (in your case) only works for object files (.o or .lib). > > Dlls are inherently dynamic. Which is why they can be *loaded* both > *statically* and *dynamically*. > You can call that "implicit" vs "explicit" all you want, but the fact > remains that one is static and the other is not. Hmmm.... you should probably revisit this one. Also see Richter's "Programming Windows" series (the latest is Windows via C++).
[SNIP] > By the way, oldie... Lol.... You will probably be old one day also (statistically, if you made it to 18, you'll most likely make it to old age). [SNIP] _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
