The more knowledge of your enemy tactics you have the better no? And though I would still prefer actual proof of the info, the Pentagon top brass debunking is something they would do if it were true as well?
[email protected] wrote: > > As a result, even 100% perfect knowledge of our tactics wouldn't > translate into all *that* big an increase in attack effectiveness, unless > hidden in that 5% is a "ventilation shaft that leads directly to the reactor > core" flaw in our tactics ("Every 3rd Tuesday, we do XYZ and one very small > bomb in the right place would set off a chain reaction of all the munitions on > the base"). > > > I believe the "endangers our sources" part has already been debunked > by the top leadership at the Pentagon. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
