On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Paul Schmehl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > --On October 14, 2011 2:05:40 AM -0400 [email protected] wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:44:44 PDT, Mike Hale said: >>> Seriously! Think about the injustice of having American helicopters >>> engage armed individuals shadowing American soldiers. >> >> Shooting at "armed individuals" is one thing. If it's "civilians and >> Reuters employees" who *aren't* obviously armed, it's something else. >> > > And if they hadn't actually been armed, with AK-47s and RPGs, you might > have a point. But since they were, you don't. Yea, the reporters armed with cameras, and the unarmed bystanders and children, were a real threat.
Jeff _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
