Hello! I dont know why, but i really enjoyed his talk. I guess i was abit in tune with the humorous side ofit, but, i think he did a great, fun job :P I mean, it was prettymuch a session of , dont use svn/cvs , use git ,but with abit of fun for once! I like this,m aslong as it doesnt become a disturbing trend amongst linux programmers,i doubt that, then it was really a cool speech about git, and, although i use both git and svn, i see no problems with svn sofar, as a simple system that is, in comparison to gitweb/git , wich is also simple but i guess it has alot more advantages. i liked the video!Thanks! xd
On 25 October 2011 08:22, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Thor (Hammer of God) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > *Any* assumptions that presuppose security based on social affiliation > need to be reconsidered. > Linus Torvalds would disagree with you. Git is secure because Linus > has friends :) See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 at > 27:43. > > Jeff > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [email protected] [mailto:full-disclosure- > >>[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] > >>Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 9:32 AM > >>To: Travis Biehn > >>Cc: [email protected] > >>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Tor anonymizing network Compromised by > >>French researchers > >> > >>On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:53:02 EDT, Travis Biehn said: > >> > >>> So they put up a fake network, 'hacked' most of the nodes, and with > >>> complete control of their dummy network they were able to figure out > >>> traffic movement? > >>> > >>> This is news why? > >> > >>It's not news - it's *long* been known that Tor would be breakable if > >>somebody pwned a sufficient percentage of the nodes. It's been regarded > as > >>a mostly theoretical attack, because the sort of people that run Tor have > up to > >>now been the paranoid type that tend to secure their systems better. > >> > >>The only part of *news* in it was this: > >> > >>"Researchers showed that one third of the nodes are vulnerable," > >> > >>So maybe the "people who run Tor are more paranoid" assumption is flawed > >>and needs to be reconsidered. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
