care to share some of those drugs you're taking? i'm low on supplies here..
2011/10/26 xD 0x41 <[email protected]> > Hello! > I dont know why, but i really enjoyed his talk. > I guess i was abit in tune with the humorous side ofit, but, i think he did > a great, fun job :P > I mean, it was prettymuch a session of , dont use svn/cvs , use git ,but > with abit of fun > for once! > I like this,m aslong as it doesnt become a disturbing trend amongst linux > programmers,i doubt that, > then it was really a cool speech about git, and, although i use both git > and svn, i see no problems with svn sofar, as a simple system that is, in > comparison to gitweb/git , wich is also simple but i guess it has alot more > advantages. > i liked the video!Thanks! > xd > > > > On 25 October 2011 08:22, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Thor (Hammer of God) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > *Any* assumptions that presuppose security based on social affiliation >> need to be reconsidered. >> Linus Torvalds would disagree with you. Git is secure because Linus >> has friends :) See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 at >> 27:43. >> >> Jeff >> >> > >> >>-----Original Message----- >> >>From: [email protected] [mailto: >> full-disclosure- >> >>[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] >> >>Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 9:32 AM >> >>To: Travis Biehn >> >>Cc: [email protected] >> >>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Tor anonymizing network Compromised by >> >>French researchers >> >> >> >>On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:53:02 EDT, Travis Biehn said: >> >> >> >>> So they put up a fake network, 'hacked' most of the nodes, and with >> >>> complete control of their dummy network they were able to figure out >> >>> traffic movement? >> >>> >> >>> This is news why? >> >> >> >>It's not news - it's *long* been known that Tor would be breakable if >> >>somebody pwned a sufficient percentage of the nodes. It's been regarded >> as >> >>a mostly theoretical attack, because the sort of people that run Tor >> have up to >> >>now been the paranoid type that tend to secure their systems better. >> >> >> >>The only part of *news* in it was this: >> >> >> >>"Researchers showed that one third of the nodes are vulnerable," >> >> >> >>So maybe the "people who run Tor are more paranoid" assumption is flawed >> >>and needs to be reconsidered. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
