Still, is ISC2/CISSP credible anyway?
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >At 08:10 AM 9/3/02 -0400, Dave Aitel wrote: > >*** PGP Signature Status: good > >*** Signer: Dave Aitel (Immunity, Inc) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >(Invalid) *** Signed: 9/3/02 8:10:49 AM > >*** Verified: 9/3/02 10:07:49 AM > >*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** > > > > > >I figured I'd forward this on to the list as a warning. > >-dave > >It's not true. It's part of a larger effort by one person to bring >discredit upon (ISC)^2 (note the accepted form of abbreviation). >(ISC)^2 is aware of the general effort and is taking action they deem >appropriate. They have established an e-mail address to accept >reports of suspicious e-mail and posted a web page on the issue to >the web site with a link on the http://www.isc2.org homepage. See: >https://www.isc2.org/cgi-bin/content.cgi?page=173 > (note https; where you can also check the certificate w/your >browser) > >There are several variants of this message, including two that >alledge the (ISC)^2 mail and DB servers were successfully hacked. >Not true. > >The attack has attempted to use several IT and IT-security related >mailing lists. > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
