would it have been possable to actually replace these files manually and the PC therefore be "patched" so to speak?
-----Original Message----- From: Gary Flynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 September 2003 15:40 To: Ferris, Robin Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Ferris, Robin wrote: > I have not yet verified if the files were installed or not and thats a very > good point. I didnt and still dont know what files it changed or installed > for the ms03-026. What are they? MS03-026: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=823980 > However the eeye scanner has always proved to be correct thus far, in all > the cases that I have tried it on. As we use a standard image here it would > be odd that the patch is "ineffective" in that configuration (PATH?) I think > it is because the patch as has been noted is not always effective. -- Gary Flynn Security Engineer - Technical Services James Madison University Please R.U.N.S.A.F.E. http://www.jmu.edu/computing/runsafe _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
