[... see full disclosure mailing list for discussion/details] so i have to share the credit... cauz you use a modulus of my trick to achive similar result!!! [ well... take all the credit if you want...]
i just wanna say, see , i wasn't wrong... ps! trust me i knew that, many of such similar thing's is possiple <just don't wanna create a long list's of CRAPS!] hell, there are lot of thing's....... EVEN IF YOU HOLD SOME [SPECIALLY CRAFTED!] DIALOG BUTTONS OT WILL SHOW SIMILAR ISSUE!!! WELL, i can't still figure out... WHAT CUSES THE REAL problem cauz i have been getting about equal positive and negative responce from all around the globe!!! ------------------------------------------------- --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 02:18:16 +0200, Richard Spiers > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > whoopee!. Bleh. Really a security issue? Same > thing happens if you have show > > windows content enabled and you drag around a > window, as long as your > > dragging the window, the cpu will remain close to > 100 % usage. Significant? > > Probably not directly, but possibly indirectly. > > The questions are, of course: > > 1) Is the 100% cycle sucking done as a pre-emptible > thing, or can you > cpu-starve something else using it? > > 2) Is there some *other* security-related API that > botches incorrectly if it's > cpu-starved? > > > No, unless its proof of some shoddy coding of > some-sort. > > A hammer is a useful tool for finding > non-impact-resistant screws...... > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
