Friday, 27 October, 2000, 16:23 GMT 17:23 UK Probably not :)
>-- Original Message -- >Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] W2K source "leaked"? >From: Byron Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Gregory A. Gilliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: 12 Feb 2004 20:16:03 -0500 > > >As an avid FULL DISCLOSURE reader, where is this "some of" source code? > >On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 18:55, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote: >> Does this count as confirmation? >> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/993933.stm >> >> G >> >> On or about 2004.02.12 23:48:52 +0000, Gadi Evron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >said: >> >> > A couple of days ago a friend of mine drew my attention to the source > >> > making rounds on the encrypted p2p networks, I was hoping it would take > >> > a bit longer for it to be "out", but that was just day-dreaming. >> > >> > Thor Larholm just gave me this URL, as you can notice, the server is >busy: >> > http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=17509 >> > >> <<SNIP>> > >_______________________________________________ >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
