The source is widely available on the P2P networks now. Will anyone have the courage to admit downloading a copy so they can give us a scoop on what's inside the archive? From the filename manifest that was published, it certainly seem enticing.
-mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "sil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gadi Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Thor Larholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:42 PM Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: W2K source "leaked"? > > This is the CNET article going up. > > http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5158496.html > > Again, I don't know/care if this is true of MS' source code being posted, > and I too smell something fishy in the air with this whole 'story' coming > out. Considering there is supposedly 600mb's or so of alleged code, but > unless MS says something, I wouldn't know what to think of it. > > > On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Gadi Evron wrote: > > > > > Can anyone confirm this is the real source code? How about a press > > release? :) > > > > Gadi Evron > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > "The most tyrannical of governments are those which make > crimes of opinions, for everyone has an inalienable > right to his thoughts." -- Benedict Spinoza > > > //sil > > http://www.kungfunix.net http://www.politrix.org > http://www.infiltrated.net http://bush.shafted.us > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
