Just thought I'd highlight some things ""We have never had vulnerabilities exploited before the patch was known," he said. "
"Mr Aucsmith said he could only think of one instance when a vulnerability was exploited before a patch was available." Which one is it? And at any rate both are ridiculous. ""Almost all attacks against our software are against the legacy systems," he said." Riiiight.....so everybody out there is out hax0ring win 95 boxes instead dcoming or d0ssing win2k and XP. Isn't 95% of all the stuph we see on this list referring to XP or 2k? My 0.0002c Richard Spiers Dksaarth -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 February 2004 07:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] What's wrong with this picture? Somebody want to explain to this guy that there's a difference between "publicly available" exploits and 0-day exploits circulating in the underground? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3485972.stm Scary part is that he's a high honcho at Microsoft's security unit. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.346 / Virus Database: 194 - Release Date: 2002/04/10 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.346 / Virus Database: 194 - Release Date: 2002/04/10 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
