-----Original Message----- >I thought about this fact as well, but it's typical semantics playing into >PR bull. He said could only think of one instance of an exploit before a >patch was available. However, note that he very carefully sidesteps the >issue by first saying no exploits have existed since "before the patch was >known." Not available. Basically he's saying "OK, well this one time, we >announced a forthcoming patch and an exploit was discovered to be in >existence before we actually got around to releasing the patch."
>Ahh, the spin cycle. >-chris You want to put him in a washing machine? Actually, on reflection that's not all that bad an idea... Jos _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
