Nice try. On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 12:04:46PM -0400, Exibar wrote:
> From: "Exibar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: > [Full-Disclosure] 1 patch for 1 vulnerabiliy for Linux and BSD? gunna try and sell > us a bridge now too? > Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 > 12:04:46 -0400 > > Looks like Linux Math is just as bad as Microsoft math now huh? > What happened to one patch for one vulnerability? Looks like there > is 5 in this one...... You will *not* see Debian or anyone else trying to spin this into "..oh we have 'way, 'way fewer vulns than Micro$oft does so we're 'way, 'way better..." That's Micro$oft's motive, pure and simple, for releasing multiple patches in the fewest possible packages. Then in two months or six months some bullsh*t TCO study will say "Oh, look, Micro$oft has so, so few patches!!" feh.. - John -- 10 print "Home" 20 print "Sweet" 30 goto 10 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
