are you kidding me? for years and years all I've heard from *nix people is how secure the OS is and that there aren't as many patches needed for it and if a vuln is found a patch is released right away....
Ex ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Sage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exibar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:17 PM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] 1 patch for 1 vulnerabiliy for Linux and BSD? gunna try and sell us a bridge now too? > Nice try. > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 12:04:46PM -0400, Exibar wrote: > > > From: "Exibar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: > > [Full-Disclosure] 1 patch for 1 vulnerabiliy for Linux and BSD? gunna try and sell us a bridge now too? > > Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 > > 12:04:46 -0400 > > > > Looks like Linux Math is just as bad as Microsoft math now huh? > > What happened to one patch for one vulnerability? Looks like there > > is 5 in this one...... > > You will *not* see Debian or anyone else trying to spin this into > "..oh we have 'way, 'way fewer vulns than Micro$oft does so we're > 'way, 'way better..." > > > That's Micro$oft's motive, pure and simple, for releasing multiple > patches in the fewest possible packages. > > Then in two months or six months some bullsh*t TCO study will say "Oh, > look, Micro$oft has so, so few patches!!" > > > feh.. > > > - John > -- > 10 print "Home" > 20 print "Sweet" > 30 goto 10 > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
