Michal Zalewski wrote: > If we must toy with bogus marketspeak "equations", shouldn't E - at the > very least - numerically correspond to the consequences (loss?) caused by > an event, rather than being an event itself? > > Otherwise, my risk R of getting a bar of chocolate from a stranger is > 0.001 * getting_chocolate_bar_from_stranger. >
Or ten times that if you're prepared to give them your administrator password... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
