> > How about changing the ".exe" convention? Making a file > executable by it's "extension" probably causes a lot of > opportunities for problems, doesn't it? > > Also, the magic file names, like "CON" and "AUX" should go away. >
No way! Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to create scripts and such at the command line? Please tell me I'm not? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
