On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:04:37 +1200, "Stuart Fox (DSL AK)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> No way! Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to > create scripts and such at the command line? Please tell me I'm not? I think the intent is that "con as a special filename in every directory" has to go away - you'd still be able to use copy c:\something\con filename.txt (Remember, us Unix people have had to use /dev/tty and /dev/null and /dev/zero for 3 decades, and never minded that 'tty', 'null', and 'zero' didn't exist in every single directory)....
pgp9z4tIvHqSM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
