> Per the Free Software model it does. The key point here is that Red Hat > is redistributing the code and making a profit off of it. It's Red > Hat's choice regarding whether to redistribute said code. Since they're > making the money off of it, they have to support it. >
Sorry Barry but your wrong. If I burn a CD of a bunch of appliactions I get off the net and sell it, then by what your saying I should be supporting it? So then my ISP should support all the applications I get off the net since they take my money and give me net access? > Sendmail and Bind have been riddled with bugs, this is true, but I don't > know if I'd label them some of the most buggy bits of code ever written. :) > > But, as you said, there are far better choices out there -- and Red Hat > (hypothetically speaking, of course) has the choice to distribute those > instead of sendmail/bind. Have to agree with you here. To me some of the software that they have "bundled" into their CD's has been odd to say the least. I fear that RH will probally try to become like M$ in the linux world. Denis _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
