On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 15:07, Leif Sawyer wrote: > On Mon, July 19, 2004, Eric Paynter replied to: > > nicolas vigier, whom said:
> Not to mention all the vendors out there whose products have > assinine restrictions, because they can't be bothered to code > portable web-apps. > > Think Cisco, for one. > > I personally think that _EVERYBODY_ with a CCO contract should > open up a TAC case complaining that X-application (website, > RME, VMS, etc..) doesn't work with a W3C-Standards Compliant > browser, nor with latest-bug-fixed JREs. > > I've already got mine open, but of course "Use I.E. or some > old version of Netscape Navigator, and an old JRE!" is the > typical response. They need a lot more prodding to keep their > security platform up-to-date with security standards. I have been griping to my Cisco sales team for years (being an Ex-Cisco SE myself) about the dismal support for any browser but IE. I could dump IE entirely were it not for my Call Manager. At least it seems that some of the products that they acquired that were initially cross-platform usually remain fairly browser-agnostic. -- ------------------------------ Richard Silver Sr Network Engineer East Alabama Medical Center www.eamc.org ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
