On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:52:44 -0500, Richard Silver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 15:07, Leif Sawyer wrote: > > On Mon, July 19, 2004, Eric Paynter replied to: > > > > Think Cisco, for one. > > > > I personally think that _EVERYBODY_ with a CCO contract should > > open up a TAC case complaining that X-application (website, > > RME, VMS, etc..) doesn't work with a W3C-Standards Compliant > > browser, nor with latest-bug-fixed JREs. > > > > I've already got mine open, but of course "Use I.E. or some > > old version of Netscape Navigator, and an old JRE!" is the > > typical response. They need a lot more prodding to keep their > > security platform up-to-date with security standards. > > I have been griping to my Cisco sales team for years (being an Ex-Cisco > SE myself) about the dismal support for any browser but IE. I could dump > IE entirely were it not for my Call Manager. > > At least it seems that some of the products that they acquired that were > initially cross-platform usually remain fairly browser-agnostic. > > -- > ------------------------------ > Richard Silver > Sr Network Engineer > East Alabama Medical Center > www.eamc.org > ------------------------------
It's funny you mentioned that - just came back from Networkers 2004 in New Orleans, and this was one of the biggest complaints and hottest topics there - and you know what the answer of Cisco "geeks"/developers was? They recognized their web interface sucks, and they are looking (?!?) into better java support, but it is a problem of speed that they're dealing with, and the only solution for this - so far - is (presumably) what they already offer us ... Stef _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
