I forgot to make sure everybody else has a chance to view my remarks
to Barry's obviously short-sighted arguments.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Thomas Sutpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:31:49 -0700
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush
Win In Florida
To: bkfsec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:02:41 -0500, bkfsec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So anyone who is concerned about the system and has shown that they
> aren't on your side of the political fence should have their opinion
> sumarily tossed out?

I never said what side of the fence I'm on.  You, however, have made
it more than amply clear where you are.  You've already shown your
hand, and like it or not, you're be labelled accordingly.

> Well, since you so clearly have shown your own allegiance, wouldn't the
> case be the same for you?  Thanks for the opening.
>
> Everyone, please disregard Thomas' opinions - he's shown himself to not
> be impartial.

This coming from you.  Sorry, that doesn't wash.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Reply via email to