Well thanks for trying to pull it off the list...lol > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bkfsec > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 2:49 PM > To: Thomas Sutpen > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Fwd: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers > Challenge Bush Win In Florida > > I wanted to make sure that everybody else has a chance to > view my remarks to Thomas' obviously unintelligable gripe > with me, while we're being immature and foolish here. Why > break the chain, right? > > Thomas, if you're going to pick a fight, please pick one you > can handle with a modicum of grace. I tried to take this > offlist, but you insist on dragging it back on... very sad. > > Maybe you feel that your non-argument with regard to me can > only be bulstered by slanderous personal attacks. I can play > that game, too. > Have a nice day. :) > > > Thomas Sutpen wrote: > > >I forgot to make sure everybody else has a chance to view my remarks > >to Barry's obviously short-sighted arguments. > > > > > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >From: Thomas Sutpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:31:49 -0700 > >Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush > >Win In Florida > >To: bkfsec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:02:41 -0500, bkfsec > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>So anyone who is concerned about the system and has shown that they > >>aren't on your side of the political fence should have their opinion > >>sumarily tossed out? > >> > >> > > > >I never said what side of the fence I'm on. You, however, have made > >it more than amply clear where you are. You've already shown your > >hand, and like it or not, you're be labelled accordingly. > > > > > You seem to be ashamed of who you are. That's a pity. :) > > Label me however you like. I really could care less. I've shown my > hand? :) That's pretty funny. > > > > > > >>Well, since you so clearly have shown your own allegiance, > wouldn't the > >>case be the same for you? Thanks for the opening. > >> > >>Everyone, please disregard Thomas' opinions - he's shown > himself to not > >>be impartial. > >> > >> > > > >This coming from you. Sorry, that doesn't wash. > > > > > > > Sure it washes. In fact, it washes so much that the irony of > my sarcasm > was entirely lost on you. > > Pity... maybe you should read a little bit more closely next time. I > can talk to some people and maybe recommend a remedial level reading > class for you. I'd have to look pretty far, though - no one > I know does > such a poor job as to require the remedial class you seem to need. > > -Barry > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html