Drsolly wrote: > > For copyright infringement? Well, kinda -- specifically under the > > DMCA. Pointing out that ROT13 is not really an "effective" encryption > > mechanism with which to "secure" copyrighted digital content is itself > > NOT allowed under the DMCA (showing what a shitty little piece of law > > it really is -- it's a law so bad it has to make some forms of > > potential criticism of it illegal). > > Sometimes, I wear a different hat, which acts as a way of changing my > usual (copyright) appearance. If someone suggests removing my > hat, might they fall foul of this hilarious US law?
_If_ you calimed the hat was a cryptographic device intended to make unauthorized copying of your image more difficult, I suspect the answer is "quite possibly"... Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
