On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Nick FitzGerald wrote: > Drsolly wrote: > > > > For copyright infringement? Well, kinda -- specifically under the > > > DMCA. Pointing out that ROT13 is not really an "effective" encryption > > > mechanism with which to "secure" copyrighted digital content is itself > > > NOT allowed under the DMCA (showing what a shitty little piece of law > > > it really is -- it's a law so bad it has to make some forms of > > > potential criticism of it illegal). > > > > Sometimes, I wear a different hat, which acts as a way of changing my > > usual (copyright) appearance. If someone suggests removing my > > hat, might they fall foul of this hilarious US law? > > _If_ you calimed the hat was a cryptographic device intended to make > unauthorized copying of your image more difficult, I suspect the answer > is "quite possibly"... It's a steganographic device.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
