-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- der Mouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As more and more governmental operations go online, and as electronic >> commerce is targeted, this crosses traditional boundaries with >> regards to how one defines terrorism. > >I disagree. Guerilla warfare, perhaps, but terrorism? I don't see >anything here that induces public terror, or even fear. Identity theft >is a pain, but as far as I've been able to tell it's not the sort of >thing that provokes the kind of terror that makes "terrorism" an >appropriate label. Let's just settle for "criminal activity"... - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012) wj8DBQFGSz5zq1pz9mNUZTMRAvQKAKCqSNWZ+ZZuyNVaitW2C8zegA1ZfQCgyPjy Dlqnw+uDjetf8pKG3yei9yk= =paqF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
