-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>It would seem to be more appropriate for Interpol to act as a >clearinghouse or enabler for national LEOs to track down the miscreants. I admit not knowing if Interpol has the appropriate agreements in place with either/both Estonia and the source(s) of the attacks. > >For that matter, does Interpol have the internal infrastructure/clue to >deal with international cybercrime? Or are they where the US FBI was a decade ago? > I don't know. But stories this this one [below] bothers me, given that the trial judge in an international terrorism case doesn't quite grasp the basic definition what a "website" is: http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSL1667622520070516 Not very encouraging. Where has he been? Living under a a rock? :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012) wj8DBQFGS0Ypq1pz9mNUZTMRAvyaAKCLwsNOoOwrC5XNpieb8caMZwFjnwCgn/WE n4KPsiADuAYBbLQ5M53tZUA= =cKN+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
