-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Richard M. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anybody looked into this alleged P2P problem? It should be easy enough to >do searches for documents files and see what pops up. > The title of that article _should_ be "Vilifying p2p: House Panel Scrutinizes File-Sharing." It would surprise me if this was just another effort by the RIAA/MPAA under the guise of "protecting sensitive information" or whatever the scare tactic de jour is. In any event, I know the _Japanese_Government_ has had plenty of problems with p2p (Winny) and the inadvertent loss of sensitive information: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/search?q=winny (Note: Even one retarded incident involving my current employer prior to my coming to work for them in early 2006 :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014) wj8DBQFGptk8q1pz9mNUZTMRAoK9AKDL6PUbuZyOdt3qk7DB08DncPHFxQCgrRNN tJMHoNPso/YE40OJiPkfSr4= =jn0P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
