On 8/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:00:04 CDT, Brian Loe said: > > > Let me ask you, is that manager supposed to allow for a certain amount > > of damage done to his store by maladjusted teens? I mean, is the > > manager/store supposed to pay for product that some kid breaks? Is he > > suppose to "allow for" that kind of incident and budget accordingly? > > Yes, they *do* allow for it,
No, they don't. The description I gave was not of anonymous losses, but of known responsible parties. > Remember - the world is as it is, not as you would like it to be. Gee, where would I be without you. Its absolutely amazing that I have made it this far in life without such guidance. > > > Oh, a HANDLE INSIDE the safe, which would somehow over-ride the lock > > on the outside of the safe allowing it to turn and open. > > Well, *duh*. Where did you *think* it was going to be, on the *outside*? > That would be stupid. That would be. Once again, thank you. You've responded to all of my points, as expected. I feel corrected. <I'll let you know ahead of time that I am, again, joking> _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
