On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Brian Loe wrote: > On 8/30/07, Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, given that I can't stop people from becoming criminals, I rather like > > the idea of making it substantially more difficult for them to murder. > > Sure, if you could magically disappear all guns, people would still hit > > each other with bricks. But it's a lot harder to murder with a brick, than > > with a gun. > > 1) You have obviously never been hit over the head with a brick. > > 2) Lets say fewer guns DID reduce the murder rate (there's not a > single fact showing it, but this is for pretend purposes). Now, > instead of 4 million people murdered only 2 million are. Of those 2 > million dead, how many might you and your law be responsible for? As I > said, until this nirvana of zero guns is reached, innocent will die > without even the opportunity to defend themselves - which is morally > reprehensible. A reduction in the murder numbers of two million sounds pretty desirable. Go for it!
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
