On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:32:04 CDT, Brian Loe said: > That would be the only argument you could win - but only if you > considered it moral to lead those 2 million to their slaughter > yourself, as in to a concentration camp, defenseless. Personally I > find it equally as bad to disarm arm a person as it is to murder them > yourself.
A *disarmed* person can at least theoretically re-arm themselves by getting another weapon, and even in a war zone like Baghdad *still* has a 80% or 90% chance of being alive a year later. A *dead* person is usually pretty much out of options and will *still* be 100% dead a year later. Conflating the two merely indicates you don't understand the very real distinction between them.
pgpOofWiQDuXq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
