-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Daniel H. Renner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My apologies for questioning you Ferg, and I do not mean that facetiously, but wouldn't a device such as a computer running IPCop with ClamAV on it count as similar to TM's patent? And hence, prior "art"? > Hey, I'm no expert on these patent matter -- I'm an engineer. I'm no lawyer, either -- which appears to be where this whole issue resides. I'm unfamiliar with IPCop, so I couldn't say. Again, I'm treading very lightly here because I'm in a delicate position while corporate attorneys do their thing. I've just resolved myself to pointing out references and commentary, and I'll leave the fear-mongering, Trend Micro-bashing, and punditry to others. :-) Thanks, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHoW7Iq1pz9mNUZTMRAq7+AJ0bun+rQpVwMAvc6hdx+rUxbMUOcACfS2Q4 AmW+NwbDyIz4627m+3fiJmk= =HkQr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
