Paul Ferguson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > - -- "Daniel H. Renner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My apologies for questioning you Ferg, and I do not mean that > facetiously, but wouldn't a device such as a computer running IPCop with > ClamAV on it count as similar to TM's patent? And hence, prior "art"? > > Hey, I'm no expert on these patent matter -- I'm an engineer. > > I'm no lawyer, either -- which appears to be where this whole issue > resides. > > I'm unfamiliar with IPCop, so I couldn't say. > > Again, I'm treading very lightly here because I'm in a delicate > position while corporate attorneys do their thing. > > I've just resolved myself to pointing out references and commentary, > and I'll leave the fear-mongering, Trend Micro-bashing, and punditry > to others. :-) > > Thanks, > > - - ferg >
I understand and would concur in your case. For your data banks: (If I remember correctly) IPCop was a fork of Smoothwall, a Linux-based firewall that can be installed on pretty much any computer, with any number of NICs attached for multiple LANs. Pretty damn decent actually IMHO, though for more demanding installs we tend to use Endian which is a fork of both and has more fine control capabilities and a built-in SMTP server. Sincerely, Daniel H. Renner President Los Angeles Computerhelp A division of Computerhelp, Inc. 818-352-8700 http://losangelescomputerhelp.com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
