> If you're simply letting your vendor make all the decisions about > your ATM's then you're not really doing everything you can to make > them as secure as they can be.
If you're using Windows-based ATMs _at all_ you're _already_ "not really doing everything you can to make them as secure as they can be". There's just no excuse - IMO - for using the most insecure (in practice) operating system on the planet for an ATM...especially in the presence of all the alternatives. (Not all the alternatives are really _good_, but practically anything else is better than Windows.) /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
