-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Wes Deviers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Now, do I support the program? Not necessarily. It's easy to >defeat...but claiming that it's ineffective because AQ doesn't have a phone number is intellectually dishonest. > The point I was trying to make (perhaps poorly) is that the fact that someone in this country may be exchanging e-mail or making phones calls to some suspected terrorist is _not_ a good enough reason for an unfettered dragnet access to _everyone's_ communications without proper judicial oversight. - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFINKRLq1pz9mNUZTMRAlUUAKCE0f8HkUlFSXFMlMZD1sIAA75wdQCg41H1 4+hIDBXxBaLzygeJ9nOvVWM= =SQgQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
