Tomas L. Byrnes to me (top-postingitis corrected): > >_He_ may not, but his company (well, the one building "his" guns) > claims > >to have had the FDA approve it as a "Daily Activity Assist Device", > much > >as wheel cairs, Zimmer frames and the like are. > > > >That also means its purchase by the suitably "disabled" will be > >(partly?) > >covered by Federal government plans covering the cost of purchase of > >"assistive devices". > > And what, pray tell, is wrong with that?
Moron. _Where_ did I say there was anything wrong with it? If you do a Google search for the "palm pistol medical device" (without quotes) you will quickly find some of what I assume are your "fellow Americans" who do think there is something wrong with it, but I was just pointing out to Larry that this weapon _is_ being touted as a "medical device". > Most criminals are relatively fit young males. Handguns are the great > equalizer. No -- most criminals are (probably) relatively unfit, middle-aged (white) males. They just don't get caught, or at least, charged and convicted. > Instead of buying the "let the government be the sole protector" bs (see > how well that's working out for the good citizens of Exarchia at the > moment), look into what REALLY happens when more law abiding citizens > actually carry guns. > > I guess next you'll be suggesting that Firewalls, IDP, and Anti-virus > all be managed by the government and equipped with back doors. I get it -- this is a joke posting and you're trying to out-moron nutd1v3... If not, go masturbate over your fanciful gun safety statistics and be thankful that you're approproiately ignorant to _enjoy_ living in the (once) wealthiest non-civilized pseudo-democracy... Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
