I like Twitter. Hated it at first, but it's pretty useful to me for a number of
reasons.
1) I now know a bunch of security researchers from different companies by name
and interact with them quite a bit, whereas previously I could only have
pointed and said the company name, entirely oblivious of who worked there. I
now follow a few more interesting security research blogs that I had no idea
existed. That can only be a good thing.
2) I work in security, but have feet in both the arts / music camp (due to my
past life as an arts & music guy) and the comic book industry camp via the
reviews I used to do and having friends from University who draw a lot of
titles for people like DC.
A while ago I found a comic book scam that was all about installing Adware; I'd
have been somewhat embarrassed about approaching big hitters in the comic
industry I know only from interacting with them on their websites and asking
them directly to "spread the word". However, by sending out a simple "hey guys,
anyone who does comics might want to warn people about this" it was picked up
by a number of well known comics writers and comic related media publishers -
something I couldn't have done just by putting a blog out.
It's the fact that I can cut across my "security guy" restraints and reach
people from a whole diverse range of things I'm involved in with one short
message, all at the same time, that makes it valuable to me. Of course, you
still have to tailor your short message to be attractive enough to each camp
which also takes some time to get the hang of.
3) Simply being on Twitter has allowed me to find a number of scams (some
Twitter focused, some not) which wouldn't have happened if I wasn't using it.
Even if points 1 & 2 didn't exist, that on its own is more than enough for me.
Pg
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:37:14 -0700
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Tweet This: I Don't Care
>
> It takes a while to get a feel for twitter. Gadi made many good
> points about what there is to like about twitter (gee, am I agreeing
> with Gadi? :) Yes initially it feels like people only tweet about
> the inane and the mundane.
>
> Looking through recent tweets of people I follow, I see reports on
> SXSW (which I'm interested in), Lenovo's new pocket pc chingadera,
> stuff on the bailout & AIG, & a place to test my web site against
> every browser. A lot of it is a tweet w/a link. Yes, there's mundane
> stuff too but it's easy to skip over. There's a critical mass of
> people you need to follow before you get over the "inane & mundane"
> hump. It helps to follow a diverse group of people, including
> followees of your followees.
>
> My impression is that most people who pooh-pooh Twitter have either
> never tried it or tried it for a very short time and gave up before
> getting over the aforementioned "inane & mundane hump".
>
> The world's changing. It's not Usenet, bang-path addresses, and
> dialup BBS's any more and like it or not, we won't be going back
> there. Change with the times or be changed by them.
>
> - Paul -
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_________________________________________________________________
Free photo editing software from Windows Live . Try it now!
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665240/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
