This is just an example of someone trying to do something about something that they know nothing about. It won't work, mark my words. If I'm wrong I'll eat my socks on youtube. :)
On Apr 24, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Larry Seltzer wrote: > http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/04/netonline-priva.html > > “…[Congressman Rick] Boucher made it clear he's concerned about ISPs > using so-called deep packet inspection technology, or DPI, to > examine the data packets it delivers to and from its customers.” > > How far can this go? Does Bayesian analysis violate privacy of > spammers? > > Larry Seltzer > eWEEK.com Security Center Editor > http://security.eweek.com/ > http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. Adriel T. Desautels [email protected] -------------------------------------- Subscribe to our blog http://snosoft.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
