> According to court documents, Charles W. Papenfus, 43, allegedly > told a sales representative during a May 18 telephone call that he > would burn down the building and kill the employees and their > families. He was indicted for making a terrorist threat, a Class D > felony; and he could be sentenced to up to four years in prison if > convicted.
Maybe I'm overlooking something key, but I'm finding the reactions on the thread here sort of puzzling. I mean, if threatening to burn down a building and kill the occupants and their families isn't a terrorist threat, I don't know what is. Presumably he didn't say it in order to make the person at the other end of the line feel *more* secure in life and property, and to calm their fears... Now maybe he didn't mean it, maybe he was just upset and speaking without any actual intent, and if so great he can use that in his defense at trial, and maybe he'll be acquitted as a result. But really, if I yell into a phone that I'm going to burn down a building and kill a company's employees and their families, I would hope I *would* get to spend a little time in a quiet place, thinking about whether that was really a wise thing to say... Not the kind of thing this left-libertarian usually finds himself writing to mailing lists, DC
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
