Rich Kulawiec wrote: > About a year ago, I went several rounds with a local financial institution > while trying to deposit money into an account. They wanted a thumbprint > in order to verify that fraud wasn't being attempted, and were utterly > impervious to the point that it was a DEPOSIT, not usually a profitable > means of fraud.
If it was a deposit into an account other than your own and it was a check, that would make a little bit of sense, but I would think it would drive customers away. That's not a Federal guideline, if you're in the US, btw - it would have been a local policy. If it was your own account, I would recommend you to change banks. Personally, I would never do business with a place that has rules of that sort. Depositing is a profitable means of fraud. It's how check kiting is done. > > ---Rsk > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > -- Rob +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | _ | | ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | | - against HTML email X | | / \ | | | +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
