--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Hubbard, Dan <[email protected]> wrote: > @FunSec really has no point, we do silly things on it, and this > is why I actually read most of the posts (which is more I > can say about the majority of the other lists I am on).
WOOF! In fact, this is the only security list I consistently inhabit (other than fw-wiz, and that's only to have my traditional bi-annual dustup with Marcus :~). I don't spend a lot of time configuring snort for use in diatomic B2B environments, and I usually don't feel like arguing about the proper arrangement of isotopic particles in northeast asian proxies firewalls, so most lists can bite my mule. > Therefore I believe it does matter J and agree there should always be > room for uselessness, fun, silly, banter. Silliness will be enforced. All bits used on funsec have been pre-screened for charm quark density. Funsec members are so cool they the UN has approved their use as replacement for CFCs in air conditioning systems. Funsec once tried being lame and boring just to see how it felt. We now return you to your regularly scheduled moosings. -chris http://motleymoose.com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
