I'm torn on active netsec (AV, FW, IDS) because I'm pretty sure that  
it's the least cost-effective place to work on security.  At the same  
time, from a management perspective you can buy it as a separate  
component (am I secure?  Well, I've checked off that "I bought a  
firewall" box, so I *must* be scure), and because it does give  
developers a way out.


On Sep 29, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Kenneth L. Bechtel, II wrote:

> On Tuesday 29 September 2009 11:48:51 am [email protected]  
> wrote:
>> Yah, too bad many corporations turn off the built in FW in SP2 via  
>> GPO ;-(
>> But the additions in SP2 were a GodSend for home users, agreed.
>
>
> Let's face it, in reality the new "features" in OS' have been the  
> biggest
> advances we've had in combating malware.  Win95 deployments helped  
> wipe out
> the Bootsector infecter, while WinNT/ Win2000 was the nail in that  
> box for a
> long time.  As pointed out XP SP2 really nailed down worms, but that  
> was also
> assisted with "Desktop Firewalls".  Anti-Virus and other security  
> Software are
> only bandages, and do a great job of slowing/ stopping the  
> hemorrhage.  but
> they are specific tools looking for specific cuts, and we ARE  
> fighting the death
> of 1000 cuts.
>
> -- 
> Kenneth L. Bechtel, II
> Team Anti-Virus
> Phone - 717-579-9083                              | WildList Reporter
> P.O. Box 635, Palmyra, PA 17078              | Founding member AVIEN
> E-mail - [email protected]      | Member AVAR
> PGP Footprint: 969E 2A27 3042 EE52 AEFB  6FF0 2711 9467 D38C 5C0F
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to