On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:51 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:49:52 GMT, Florian Weimer said: >> * Rich Kulawiec: >> >> > So of course they're in favor of .mobi and .info and .pro and >> > as many more variations as possible, because every time another >> > one is launched, they get to do this all over again. >> >> But this whole thing only works if new TLDs are relatively rare. If >> they aren't, the whole scheme breaks down. > > But now, they're going to add .foobar in ascii, and the cyrillic (possibbly > different renderings if the word for 'foobar' is different in different > countries - consider .truck and .lorry), and Mandarin, and kanji, and all > hell breaks loose in India,,,, So we'll be adding them 20 or 30 at a > shit...
Will different people be running the various renderings of .foobar? Ultimately that's what matters from an enforcement perspective. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
