[email protected] wrote: > http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=359423 >
Graph at the end of page reminded me of this report from surfacestations.org: http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/surfacestationsreport_spring09.pdf > Of course, it's exactly these sort of corrections to the data that have the > climate-change deniers jumping up and down yelling 'ZOMG! Cooked Data!', and > why many of the scientists advocated not releasing the raw uncorrected data. > If I'm calculating it properly, it means that NOAA increased corrections through 20th century, so they got to +0.25C correction of raw data in 2000. As far as I remember, they calculated linear trend of about 0.6C, so it seems like this scientists are causing about half of global temperature rise.. ;-) -- Martin Tomasek _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
