Just something to chew on: A number of court decisions (press me harder and
I can search for the titles) rule in favor of the administration of public
schools in cases that would have otherwise been seen a pure violation of a
student's rights. These cases often invoke an argument of *In loco
parentis*for the administration. Though in every case I have read the
rulings
concerned actions taken on school grounds or within close proximity. This
case involves school property (the laptop), but occurs at the students home.
I am curious how this shakes out and what the court ruling (and inevitable
appeal ruling) will say.

My 2 dinars  =)
-Ben

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon &
Hannah <[email protected]> wrote:

> Date sent:              Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:28:13 -0600
> From:                   RandallM <[email protected]>
>
> > http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/17/school-used-student.html
>
> and
>
> http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/02/18/24789.htm
>
> "A federal class action claims a suburban school district has been spying
> on
> students and families through the "indiscriminant use of and ability to
> remotely
> activate the webcams incorporated into each laptop issued to students,"
> without
> the knowledge or consent of students or parents. The named plaintiffs say
> they
> learned that Big Brother was in their home when an assistant principal told
> their
> son that the school district knew he `was engaged in improper behavior in
> his
> home, and cited as evidence a photograph from the webcam embedded in minor
> plaintiff's personal laptop issued by the school district.'"
>
> Always possible that the allegations are wrong or overstated, but, on the
> face of it,
> sounds like this school district could be in very serious trouble ...
>
> (Cue comments about protecting children, and being willing to give up
> personal
> freedoms for a worthy cause, etc ... )
>
> ======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
> [email protected]     [email protected]     [email protected]
> What you ... call a poor signal-to-noise ratio is the 'glue' that
> holds a community together, that lets us recognize one another as
> people rather than roles.                            - Anton Aylward
> victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/slade/index.html
> http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
> http://twitter.com/NoticeBored http://twitter.com/rslade
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to