On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Peter Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:58:50PM -0800, Dan Kaminsky wrote: >> Did anyone actually read the ruling? >> They're basically saying a SSN# isn't an identity. >> Given that SSN#'s aren't actually unique in the population, they're, you >> know, right. > > They aren't? > > I thought they were supposed to be. Like passports and driver's > licenses.
Nawp, I was wrong. They're non-random, but unique. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
