On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:55 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:52:03 PST, "Tomas L. Byrnes" said: > >> While I would never advocate criminality, it would be poetic justice if >> the SSIDs of all the justices who voted in favor of this SSIDs were >> posted on some website used to sell such data to those looking for >> "clean credit". >> >> After all, it is no big deal, according to them. > > My reading of it is that they didn't think it was "no big deal", it was > that the law *as written* didn't make it actually *illegal*. In cases like > that, don't complain about the judge, complain about the legislative body > that wrote the flawed law. Its funny how Judges will "legislate from the bench" when it suits them or their keepers (or fraternity brothers, or college buddies, or former law partners, or those making campaign contributions, etc)....
Jeff _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
