Agreed. On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Alex Eckelberry <[email protected]>wrote:
> Odd. I have had virtually zero FPs and I don't get any crap in my inbox. > That, to me, is a pretty fair test of a spam filter. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Rich Kulawiec > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:39 AM > To: funsec > Subject: Re: [funsec] Im lovin google spam filter > > > Google's anti-spam implementation merits no more than a "D" grade; it makes > a number of obvious, well-known design and implementation errors, the false > positive rate is appallingly high, and then there's the matter of *outbound* > filtering, which is always far more important than inbound. > > Of course, this still puts it far ahead of Yahoo and Hotmail, which earn an > "F" only because "Z" is not an available grade. > > ---rsk > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > -- Joel Esler | http://blog.snort.org | http://blog.joelesler.net Twitter: http://twitter.com/joelesler
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
